Rules and Regulations for Currently Serving PCVs online journals and blogs
In general, current volunteers should still keep in mind their own safety and security, cultural sensitivity, and the fact they are in-country representing the United States. See Manual Section 204 regarding Volunteer conduct and Section 543 regarding Volunteer use of information technology tools.
MS 543.7Websites: Volunteers who create their own Web sites, or post information to Web sites that have been created and maintained by others, should be reminded that, unless password protected, any information posted on the Internet can be accessed by the general public, even if that is not intended. Because search engines regularly index most sites on the Internet, it is possible that members of the public could locate a Volunteer Web site by searching for information about the Peace Corps or a certain country. This is possible even if the Volunteer does not actively promote his/her Web site. Given these realities, Volunteers are responsible for ensuring that their IT use is consistent with the following guidelines:
7.1 Notification
7.2 Disclaimer
7.3 Use of the Peace Corps Logo
7.4 Cultural Sensitivity
7.5 Safety and Security
7.6 Publication Policies
Title 18 Criminal and Other Investigations Conducted
Investigations Leading to Disposition
During the previous reporting period, the OIG opened an investigation relating
to a Volunteer serving in a Middle Eastern country engaging in public political
statements in violation of Agency policy. A variety of Peace Corps Manual
sections and Handbook procedures require Peace Corps Volunteers to maintain
an apolitical posture in their country of service and refrain from becoming
involved in the political affairs of their host country. Among the sentiments
expressed in the Volunteer’s internet-based journal (“blog”) were political
opinions about the country in which he was serving, favorable comments about
groups classified by Executive Order as terrorist organizations, and comments
concerning the foreign policy of a neighboring country in the region. The
Volunteer’s blog was publicly available and not password protected.
During this reporting period, OIG developed additional evidence that the
Volunteer was provided with training regarding Agency prohibitions on
political statements, including the requirement of clearing any political blog
with the country director. The Volunteer acknowledged that his statements
could pose a security risk to him in his country of service. The Volunteer
further conceded that the portion of his blog in which he was critical of local
governments could have become known to the host-country Government and
undermine Peace Corps’ credibility in his host country. The Volunteer also
acknowledged associating with members of his host country’s intelligence service.
When representatives of the host government became aware of the Volunteer’s
statements and associations, they expressed concern to the U.S. Embassy about
the safety of the Volunteer and the U.S. Ambassador recommended that the
Volunteer be removed from the country within 24 hours.
The host country agency also conducted an investigation of the Volunteer’s
activity and found further evidence that he had discussed political issues with
host country nationals.
The OIG also found that the country director failed in her responsibilities to
monitor and oversee the Volunteer’s blog entries and did not object to certain
entries that were political in nature and violative of Agency’s rules and guidelines.
During this reporting period, the Volunteer resigned in lieu of administrative
separation. The country director, who had been slated to work in the Peace Corps
Director’s Office, retired in lieu of this assignment.